Home News‘I Took that Video’: former Davao journalist claims ICC prosecution misinterpreted CCTV footage of killing

‘I Took that Video’: former Davao journalist claims ICC prosecution misinterpreted CCTV footage of killing

by Rhoda Grace Saron
0 comments

AS THE International Criminal Court (ICC) began its hearing to confirm charges against former President Rodrigo Duterte on Feb. 23, a veteran Davao journalist stepped forward to challenge the prosecution’s interpretation of a key piece of video evidence.

The hearing aims to determine if “substantial grounds” exist to try the 80-year-old former leader for crimes against humanity. Central to the prosecution’s opening was a 2013 video involving the killing of three alleged thieves at the Agdao Public Market in Davao City.

Context vs. contention

ICC prosecutors alleged that the footage shows Duterte “gloating” over the killings, suggesting the perpetrators—purported members of the “Davao Death Squad” (DDS)—acted with impunity under his orders.

However, veteran Davao journalist Ben Tesiorna, posting under his Facebook name Aeson Anroiset, contested this narrative. 

Tesiorna, who was present at the time of the original recording, clarified that the context of the video had nothing to do with endorsing extrajudicial killings.

“I took that video myself and nowhere in the video was FPRRD [Duterte] gloating about the killing,” Tesiorna stated in a comment on a national media outlet’s report. “He was very proud of the high-tech CCTVs installed that can zoom into several meters—that was more than a decade ago.”

Tesiorna’s claim suggests that Duterte’s recorded reaction was directed at the city’s technological capabilities rather than the violence itself.

This development aligns with the strategy of Duterte’s lead defense counsel, Atty Nick Kaufman, who accused the prosecution of “cherry-picking” rhetoric to fit a narrative of state-sponsored violence. The defense is expected to use Tesiorna’s statement to argue that the prosecution is building its case on “contextual misrepresentations.”

Deputy prosecutor Mame Mandiaye Niang continues to maintain that Duterte oversaw a “common plan” to neutralize alleged criminals. 

The prosecution argues that the lack of resolution in cases like the Agdao killings is proof of a systematic shield of protection for the DDS.

Status of the hearing

Duterte remains in custody at the ICC Detention Center in Scheveningen. While he waived his right to attend the four-day proceedings in person, his legal team remains active in challenging the court’s jurisdiction and the validity of the evidence.

Presiding Judge Iulia Antoanella Motoc is expected to conclude the confirmation of charges hearing on Feb. 27. 

The three-judge panel of the Pre-Trial Chamber I will then have 60 days to confirm the charges for a full trial, decline the charges, effectively halting the case, or request additional evidence.

You may also like

Leave a Comment