CAN THE Philippines reduce the cost of making things, move higher up global supply chains, and turn manufacturing into a stronger engine of jobs, productivity, and inclusive growth?

The Manufacturing Paradox

Let us begin with the numbers.

The Philippines exported approximately US$84.5 billion of merchandise in 2025.

Around 80% of these exports were manufactured products.

Electronics alone generated nearly US$46 billion, or more than half of total merchandise exports.

These are substantial achievements.

Yet manufacturing represents only around 15–16% of GDP.

Industry as a whole employs only around 17% of Filipino workers, compared with more than 60% in services.

There is therefore a paradox.

Manufacturing is extremely important to Philippine exports, but it has not yet become sufficiently important to the broader domestic economy.

Why?

Because much of Philippine’s manufacturing remains concentrated in particular activities and stages of production, while domestic supply chains, local component industries, and higher-value activities remain relatively limited.

The challenge is therefore not simply to produce more.

It is to produce more competitively and to retain more value within the Philippines.

The First Question: Why is Philippine Production So Expensive?

This is where I believe the country needs to be much more candid.

If a multinational company compares the Philippines with Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, or Indonesia, it does not look only at wages.

It looks at the total cost of production.

How much does electricity cost?

How reliable is the power supply?

How much does it cost to transport a container?

How long does it take to clear a port?

How expensive is industrial land?

How easily can components move between factories?

How much does financing cost?

How predictable are regulations?

How quickly can permits be obtained?

How productive is the workforce?

How much of the required machinery and components can be sourced locally?

The Philippines needs to become competitive on all of these dimensions.

Electricity: The Competitiveness Problem We Cannot Ignore

Let us take electricity first.

For an ordinary household, electricity is an important monthly expense.

For a factory, it can determine whether the factory is competitive at all.

A semiconductor plant, steel mill, cement factory, cold-storage facility or modern electronics plant may consume enormous quantities of electricity.

If electricity is expensive, the cost of every product manufactured rises.

And if electricity is unreliable, the problem becomes even greater.

A production line cannot simply stop and restart without consequences. Interruptions can damage equipment, waste materials, delay deliveries, and disrupt international supply contracts.

Therefore, the Philippine electricity problem is not merely an energy problem.

It is a manufacturing competitiveness problem.

How Can the Philippines Bring Power Costs Down?

The authorities need to be very practical here.

Quite obviously, there is no single magic solution.

The country needs to reduce electricity costs through competition, diversification, renewable energy, better transmission, lower system losses, storage and more efficient power markets.

The Philippines has an important advantage that the country should exploit much more aggressively: renewable energy.

Recent Green Energy Auction rounds have demonstrated that developers are willing to offer renewable electricity at prices substantially below the cost that many industrial consumers currently face. For example, the indicative ceiling prices in the fourth Green Energy Auction included about ₱4.15 per kWh for ground-mounted solar and ₱5.28 per kWh for solar combined with battery storage.

The lesson is important.

Renewable energy is no longer simply an environmental proposition. It can increasingly be part of an industrial cost-reduction strategy.

But generating cheap renewable electricity is not enough.

The country needs to deliver it to factories.

That means strengthening the transmission grid.

It means reducing congestion.

It means developing energy storage.

It means allowing large industrial consumers to enter appropriate long-term power arrangements.

And it means creating greater competition in electricity procurement.

Cheap Energy Must Also Be Reliable Energy

There is an important distinction between cheap electricity and cheap reliable electricity.

A factory does not benefit from electricity that is theoretically inexpensive but unavailable when needed.

The Philippines therefore needs to think about power in terms of delivered industrial energy cost.

That includes generation, transmission, distribution and other charges, as well as the economic cost of interruptions.

The country should establish industrial zones where companies can obtain:

reliable power, competitive tariffs and long-term supply certainty.

This would immediately improve the attractiveness of those zones to global manufacturers.

Can Renewable Energy Become an Industrial Advantage?

I believe it can.

The Philippines has considerable potential in solar, wind, geothermal and other renewable sources.

The country should therefore move towards a model in which new industrial clusters are increasingly built around reliable, competitively priced and increasingly renewable electricity.

This would produce two benefits.

First, it would lower production costs over time.

Second, it would allow Philippine manufacturers to offer products with a lower carbon footprint to global customers.

That second advantage will become increasingly important.

Global companies are themselves under pressure to reduce emissions throughout their supply chains.

Therefore:

Clean energy can become part of Philippine manufacturing competitiveness.

But Electricity Alone Will Not Make the Philippines Competitive

This is equally important.

Suppose the country reduces the cost of electricity.

Will that automatically make Philippine manufacturing globally competitive?

No.

Because manufacturing competitiveness is ultimately about unit cost.

And unit cost depends on two things:

the cost of inputs and the amount of output produced from those inputs.

In simple terms:

Competitiveness = lower cost + higher productivity + better quality + reliable delivery.

This is where the second major challenge begins.

The Real Goal: Lower Unit Costs

One should be careful not to define competitiveness as simply reducing wages.

That would be a race to the bottom.

The Philippines should not try to compete with lower-income economies by keeping Filipino wages artificially low.

The Philippines should compete by making the Filipino worker more productive.

Suppose a worker produces 100 units at a certain wage.

If better machinery, training, and technology allow that worker to produce 150 units without a proportional increase in cost, the unit cost falls.

The worker can earn more.

The company becomes more competitive.

Exports become more attractive.

And the economy moves towards higher productivity.

That is the kind of competitiveness the country should pursue.

Five Ways to Make Philippine Manufacturing More Cost-Efficient

I would concentrate on five areas.

1. Energy

Lower and more reliable electricity costs.

2. Logistics

Reduce the cost and time involved in moving raw materials and finished goods.

3. Productivity

Use better technology, machinery, skills, and management to produce more with the same resources.

4. Local Supply Chains

Reduce unnecessary dependence on imported components by developing competitive Philippine suppliers.

5. Scale

Enable firms to produce at sufficient scale to spread fixed costs and compete internationally.

These five factors are interconnected.

Improving only one will not be enough.

Logistics: The Cost We Often Underestimate

The Philippines has another structural disadvantage.

The country is an archipelago.

Moving goods from one island to another can be expensive and time-consuming.

A manufacturer cannot compete effectively if components spend too much time and money moving between ports and factories.

This is why industrialisation must be accompanied by better:

• ports; 
• roads; 
• inter-island shipping; 
• rail where economically justified; 
• warehouses; 
• cold chains; 
• customs procedures; 
• digital logistics systems. 

The authorities should think about the entire journey of a product:

raw material → factory → supplier → assembly → port → overseas customer.

Every unnecessary day and every unnecessary peso along that journey reduces competitiveness

The Philippines Needs Manufacturing Clusters

This is why I strongly support the development of specialised manufacturing corridors.

Instead of spreading industrial incentives thinly across the entire country, we should identify locations where several complementary industries can operate close to one another.

Imagine an electronics cluster where semiconductor companies, component manufacturers, packaging firms, engineering companies, logistics providers and technical schools are all located within an efficient industrial ecosystem.

The same principle could apply to:

• food processing; 
• automotive components; 
• shipbuilding; 
• pharmaceuticals; 
• medical devices; 
• renewable-energy equipment. 

Proximity reduces cost.

It reduces transport.

It speeds up communication.

It makes supplier relationships easier.

It allows specialised labor markets to develop.

And it encourages innovation.

The Missing Philippine Supplier

One of the biggest weaknesses of the country’s manufacturing system is the relatively limited depth of domestic suppliers.

A multinational manufacturer may operate a large and sophisticated factory here.

But if many components, machines, and specialised inputs still have to be imported, much of the potential domestic value creation remains outside the country.

This is where Philippine SMEs become crucial.

The government should help them acquire:

• modern machinery; 
• quality certification; 
• digital systems; 
• financing; 
• technical expertise; 
• international standards. 

A major multinational factory should become the anchor around which Philippine suppliers develop.

That is how the country can turn foreign investment into domestic industrial capacity.

Electronics: We Have a Head Start

Electronics is the clearest example.

With exports approaching US$46 billion in 2025, the sector is already one of the Philippines’ greatest industrial assets.

The country should not abandon what it already does well.

The nation should move upward.

From assembly to advanced packaging.

From testing to higher-value semiconductor services.

From components to specialised components.

From manufacturing to design-linked activities.

From imported inputs to domestic supplier networks.

From factory employment to engineering, research and innovation.

The objective is not to replace Taiwan, South Korea or other established semiconductor powers.

It is to find the segments of the semiconductor and electronics value chain where the Philippines can become highly competitive and difficult to replace.

The Cost of Imported Inputs

There is another side to the competitiveness question.

The Philippines imports very large amounts of raw materials, intermediate goods and capital equipment.

This is partly a sign of an internationally integrated economy.

But it is also a warning.

If Philippine factories depend heavily on imported inputs, they become vulnerable to exchange-rate movements, shipping costs, trade disruptions and international price changes.

The country should therefore develop domestic capability where it makes economic sense.

Not everything should be produced locally.

That would be inefficient.

But where the country can become competitive in terms of its comparative advantage in components, packaging, engineering, machinery, processed materials and other industrial inputs, the nation should do so.

The objective is not self-sufficiency.

It is strategic competitiveness.

Technology is a Cost-Reduction Tool

Technology should not be viewed merely as something sophisticated factories use.

It is a way of reducing costs.

Automation can reduce defects.

Digital systems can reduce inventory.

Artificial intelligence can improve forecasting.

Sensors can reduce machine downtime.

Modern machinery can reduce material waste.

Better data can improve energy efficiency.

These improvements can lower the cost of production while simultaneously raising quality.

This is particularly important for Filipino SMEs.

The country should not allow technological upgrading to remain the privilege of large multinational corporations.

The Filipino Worker is Part of the Competitiveness Equation

There is sometimes an uncomfortable tendency to discuss workers as a cost.

I would approach the issue differently.

Workers are not merely a cost. They are a source of productivity.

A well-trained technician who can operate advanced equipment is an economic asset.

An engineer who can solve a production problem is an economic asset.

A supervisor who can reduce waste is an economic asset.

A worker who understands quality standards is an economic asset.

Therefore, investment in skills is not simply social expenditure.

It is an industrial investment.

The Youth and the New Manufacturing Economy

This is particularly important for Filipino youth.

The manufacturing jobs of the future will not necessarily be low-skilled assembly-line jobs.

They will increasingly involve:

• automation; 
• robotics; 
• electronics; 
• software; 
• data; 
• engineering; 
• maintenance; 
• quality control; 
• machine operation; 
• logistics; 
• and technical management. 

This gives the Philippines an opportunity to change the traditional perception of manufacturing.

A modern factory can offer a young Filipino a genuine technological career.

It can be a pathway from technical education to skilled employment, from skilled employment to higher wages, and from higher wages to economic independence.

That is precisely the kind of opportunity the Philippines needs to retain more of its young talent.

What Government Should Do

I would therefore suggest a much more focused manufacturing competitiveness program.

First: Make industrial electricity cheaper and more reliable

Accelerate renewable generation, strengthen transmission, expand storage, improve competition and enable competitive long-term power arrangements for industrial consumers.

Second: Reduce logistics costs

Improve ports, shipping, roads, customs and inter-island connectivity.

Third: Build manufacturing clusters

Provide world-class infrastructure around carefully selected industrial corridors.

Fourth: Support domestic suppliers

Help SMEs meet international standards and become suppliers to multinational corporations.

Fifth: Accelerate technological upgrading

Provide access to technology, automation, digitalisation and research.

Sixth: Raise worker productivity

Strengthen technical education, apprenticeships, engineering and industry-linked training.

Seventh: Reduce regulatory uncertainty

A manufacturer making a ten-year investment needs confidence that policies will remain predictable.

Eighth: Make incentives performance-oriented

Tax incentives should increasingly reward employment, exports, technology transfer, local sourcing, research and worker training.

Ninth: Reduce unnecessary import dependence

Develop domestic capability where it is economically efficient to do so.

Tenth: Measure competitiveness properly

The government should regularly compare the Philippines with Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and other competitors on electricity, logistics, labour productivity, industrial land, financing, taxes, regulatory time and total production cost.

We cannot improve what we do not measure.

The Government Has a New Opportunity

The approval of the 2026 Strategic Investment Priority Plan gives the Philippines an opportunity to align investment incentives with national industrial priorities.

But the real test will not be the number of projects approved.

The test will be whether these projects:

create productive employment,

develop Philippine suppliers,

bring technology,

increase exports,

raise productivity,

and make the country’s industrial base deeper and more competitive.

That is the standard by which industrial policy should be judged.

The Philippines Must Compete on Productivity, Not Cheap Labor

This is perhaps the most important message I would leave with the Philippine policymakers.

The Philippines should not try to win the manufacturing race by being the country with the cheapest workers.

The country should try to become the country where a skilled Filipino worker can produce more, at higher quality, with better technology and lower total unit cost.

That allows wages to rise without destroying competitiveness.

It allows workers and companies to benefit together.

And it creates the foundation for sustained productivity growth.

Low wages are not a development strategy. High productivity is.

A New Philippine Manufacturing Compact

It would be strongly desirable to see a new compact among government, business, workers, universities and technical institutions.

Government should provide infrastructure, competitive energy and predictable rules.

Businesses should invest in technology, training and productivity.

Universities should produce skills relevant to industry.

Technical institutions should work directly with factories.

Workers should continuously upgrade their skills.

And Philippine SMEs should be helped to enter the supply chains of large companies.

Everyone has a role.

The Opportunity Is Now

The global manufacturing landscape is changing rapidly.

Companies are diversifying supply chains.

Semiconductors are becoming increasingly important.

Artificial intelligence is increasing demand for electronics and computing infrastructure.

Electric vehicles are transforming transportation.

Renewable energy is creating new industries.

ASEAN is becoming increasingly important to global production.

The Philippines has many of the ingredients required to effectively participate in this process of transformation.

But competing countries are moving quickly.

Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand and Malaysia are not waiting.

Neither should the Philippines.

---

Conclusion: Make It Cheaper to Produce in the Philippines

I believe the manufacturing debate in the Philippines can be reduced to one simple question:

Can the country make it cheaper, faster, better, and more reliable to produce something in the Philippines?

If the answer is yes, investment will follow.

If electricity becomes more competitive, factories will become more competitive.

If logistics become cheaper and faster, exports will become more competitive.

If workers become more productive, wages can rise without destroying competitiveness.

If Philippine suppliers become stronger, more value will remain in the country.

If technology improves, quality will rise and costs will fall.

And if all of these happen together, manufacturing can finally acquire the depth that the Philippine economy has been missing.

The country already has the foundations.

The Philippines have electronics.

The Philippines have a young workforce.

The Philippines have a large domestic market.

The Philippines have natural resources.

The Philippines have an important geographical position in ASEAN.

The Philippines have global companies operating here.

The Philippines have entrepreneurs.

What the country needs now is to connect these strengths.

The objective should not be simply to attract more factories.

It should be to make the Philippines a place where competitive factories want to stay, Philippine suppliers want to grow, Filipino workers want to build careers, and global companies want to deepen their supply chains.

That requires the Philippines to tackle the cost of electricity seriously.

It requires us to reduce logistics costs.

It requires the country to raise productivity.

It requires us to build domestic supply chains.

It requires the Philippines to invest in skills and technology.

And it requires policy consistency over many years.

The ultimate test is not how much manufacturing output the Philippines produces.

It is how much value is created in the Philippines, how many good jobs the country creates for Filipinos, and how much more competitive the Filipino economy becomes.

The Philippines should not aspire to become the world’s cheapest manufacturing location.

It should aspire to become one of Asia’s most efficient, productive, innovative, and reliable manufacturing locations.

That is a much more ambitious but definitely reachable and feasible goal.

But it is also a goal that can give the Filipino worker something far more valuable than a low-cost job:

a productive career, a rising income, and a stronger economic future at home.