HOW POLITICAL noise hides the truth and why citizens must refuse to look away?
Every time the Philippines inches closer to uncovering corruption, something predictable happens. Suddenly, new controversies emerge. Personalities who were not previously involved jump into the spotlight. Old political feuds are revived, and the national conversation becomes scattered and disjointed.
The public’s attention is pulled in every direction, except toward the truth that was just within reach. This pattern is not accidental. It has been rehearsed, perfected, and deployed whenever powerful interests feel threatened. The controversy surrounding the flood control project is the latest example of how diversionary tactics operate in Philippine politics.
For weeks, documents, testimonies, and insider accounts circulated, raising difficult questions about who approved certain projects, who benefited financially, and who allowed suspicious transactions to move forward. Citizens could sense that the truth was close, and the nation began to pay attention. It was at this critical moment that political noise intensified.
New storylines were introduced. Certain public figures suddenly became involved in unrelated disputes. Statements were issued that distracted rather than clarified. The noise was overwhelming, and the timing was too perfect to be a mere coincidence.
This is the essence of diversion. It is not silence but a flood of carefully designed noise intended to confuse, overwhelm, and destabilize public attention. When the truth becomes dangerous, noise becomes the most effective shield. In a country where political survival often depends on controlling narratives, diversion is a powerful strategy. It scatters focus, divides public opinion, and dilutes accountability.
At the heart of diversion is the manipulation of communication. Development communication teaches us that clear and truthful messaging brings people together and strengthens participation. Diversion does the opposite. It interrupts understanding by overwhelming citizens with irrelevant information. It buys time for those who fear exposure.
While the public debates new distractions, the individuals involved in the scandal quietly regroup, rewrite their narratives, and prepare their defenses. Truth becomes diluted because too many voices are shouting, and the core issue becomes buried under layers of noise.
The flood control controversy deserves public scrutiny because it concerns billions of pesos meant to protect communities. When corruption infects projects that are supposed to reduce flooding, protect lives, and strengthen disaster resilience, the consequences are devastating. Families become vulnerable to stronger typhoons and heavier rains. Homes and livelihoods are destroyed.
Communities are forced to evacuate repeatedly, and lives are put at risk because the infrastructure was either compromised, delayed, or never built at all. This is why attempts to divert public attention are not only irresponsible but dangerous. They rob citizens of the chance to demand transparency on an issue that has direct impact on their safety and survival.
The emotional toll of diversion is profound. Filipinos are not only tired of corruption. They are exhausted by the way truth is constantly manipulated. Every time a scandal emerges, citizens brace themselves for the familiar sequence: denial, silence, distraction, spectacle, and eventual forgetting.
This cycle chips away at the public’s trust in institutions. It creates frustration, discouragement, and a sense of powerlessness. When people no longer believe that truth will prevail, they disengage from civic involvement. They lose hope in systems meant to protect them. This disengagement is precisely what diversion aims to achieve. A disengaged public is easier to manipulate and easier to deceive.
Diversion thrives because communication in politics is often used as a weapon rather than a tool for development. Instead of clarifying controversy, communication is used to cloud it. Instead of responding to public concerns, statements are crafted to dodge responsibility. Instead of addressing the issue directly, personalities distract citizens by igniting unrelated conflicts. Through this process, communication loses its role as a bridge between the government and people. It becomes a smokescreen.
The damage extends beyond politics. When officials refuse to speak clearly and honestly, the entire communication environment of the nation suffers. Citizens begin to distrust not only politicians but also the media, public institutions, and even fellow citizens. In a society where no one knows who to believe, truth becomes a casualty. And when truth dies, development cannot live.
Despite this, diversion is not invincible. Its effectiveness depends on citizens losing focus. It relies on people shifting their attention to new controversies, believing misleading narratives, or abandoning their interest in the issue altogether. This means the antidote to diversion is collective focus. Citizens must insist on returning to the central question even when noise tries to pull them away. They must demand clarity without being intimidated by distractions. They must follow the story to its conclusion rather than allowing it to fade.
Staying focused is an act of resistance. It prevents the powerful from escaping accountability. It keeps the truth alive at a time when confusion is the easiest political tool. It allows society to see patterns, connect information, and piece together facts that noise tries so hard to bury. Citizens can sustain this focus by seeking credible sources, revisiting primary documents, and engaging with communities that value genuine accountability. Independent journalism and civic organizations also play key roles because they help keep the conversation centered on the issue that matters.
The controversy surrounding the flood control project is not merely a test of government transparency. It is a test of the public’s ability to resist manipulation. It reveals how deeply political culture relies on orchestrated noise. It exposes the fragility of truth when communication is weaponized. And it challenges citizens to remain vigilant in a landscape designed to distract them.
Silence from those involved also speaks volumes. When key actors refuse to give straight answers or avoid public inquiry, their silence becomes a statement. It signals disregard for accountability, fear of exposure, or confidence that the public will eventually look away. Silence and diversion often work hand in hand. Silence creates the vacuum, while diversion fills it with chaos. Citizens must recognize both as strategies, not accidents.
Political spaces speak even when no one talks. Press conference rooms, congressional halls, and public offices send messages through their silence, their evasions, and their refusal to confront wrongdoing. When leaders choose ambiguity over honesty, they reveal their values. When they choose distraction over transparency, they reveal their priorities. Every silence communicates a position, and every diversion reveals intent.
The Philippines cannot develop if the truth continues to be treated as optional. Progress requires honest dialogue between leaders and citizens. It requires communication rooted in clarity, not confusion. It requires leaders who face issues head-on instead of hiding behind noise. It requires a political culture that understands that transparency is not a threat but a responsibility.
The flood control controversy will eventually move through the news cycle, but the lesson must not fade. The public deserves answers. They deserve clarity on how their money was used and whether corruption played a role in endangering their communities. They deserve leaders who do not run from accountability.
The smoke before the storm can only blind us if we allow it. Citizens have the power to refuse the distraction, to demand truth, and to keep their attention fixed on what matters. The country is close to uncovering the truth. This is not the time to look away. When the truth is near, diversion becomes louder. And when diversion becomes louder, citizens must become even more determined.
We owe it to ourselves, to our communities, and to future generations to see the truth through. The storm will pass, but the truth must remain.
——————————————————————————–
Kethelle I. Sajonia is a college instructor at the University of Southeastern Philippines, Mintal Campus. She is currently in the final phase of her Doctor of Communication degree at the University of the Philippines. Her research interests include inclusivity, education, communication, and social development. She actively engages in scholarly research and community-based initiatives that advocate for inclusive and transformative communication practices.
